Aspen Publishing
0

United States ex rel. Rodriguez v. Hughes, et. al.: Motions, Faculty Materials

Paul J. Zwier, Reuben A. Guttman, Matthew J. McCoyd, Alexander G. Barney

$45.00

  • ISBN: 9781601564931

In stock.

  • Description

    NITA would like to acknowledge that this case file was produced through Emory’s Center for Advocacy and Dispute Resolution, with a special thanks to Reuben Guttman and the firm of Grant & Eisenhofer for their help in authoring the materials. The four case files of United States ex rel. Rodriguez v. Hughes, et al. explore the suit brought by Juan Rodriguez, a prominent engineer, who acted as a whistleblower against his employer, Hughes Aircraft, for violations of the False Claims Act. Richard Hughes (CEO of Hughes Aircraft) learned that the United States Department of Defense (DOD) was looking for a new helicopter to provide to the Mexican government as part of the United States' Mérida Initiative, which provided Mexico resources to help it fight its war against the drug cartels. Hughes, on behalf of Hughes Aircraft, entered into a sole source contract with the DOD. Hughes was favorably positioned to do so as it was the sole manufacturer of the Screaming Eagle helicopter S-70, the model the DOD was seeking to purchase. Rodriguez's employment background put him in a position to ascertain whether his employer, Hughes Aircraft, was making false claims to the DOD. Initially, Rodriguez had been employed at Sikorsky Aircraft Inc., a predecessor of Hughes, working in the design and manufacture of the first Screaming Eagle helicopters. Later Sikorsky Aircraft was bought by Hughes Aircraft. During his tenure at Hughes, Rodriguez had designed and retrofitted early versions of the Screaming Eagle helicopter. When retrofitted with heavy missiles, one of the first versions, the UH-A, suffered cracks on landing. Accordingly, metals intended to help crash-proof the helicopter were added to the design. Hughes also started to employ Magnaflux testing to ensure that later versions of the Screaming Eagle did not have subsurface cracks. Rodriguez claims that he saw cracks in the cabin of one of the Screaming Eagles Mexico helicopters, and that he also saw workers welding over the cracks. Rodriguez claimed that he considered the welding over of cracks in the cabin of the Screaming Eagle a "cover up" of the failure to conduct testing and thus an act of fraud—passing on defective helicopters to the governments of the United States and Mexico.

  • Additional Product Details

    False Claims Act, whistleblower, government
    Publication Date:
    1/22/2016
    Copyright: 2016
    Pages: 354
    Type: Motions, Criminal
    Issues: White Collar Crime (Whistleblower); Motions – Criminal
    Level: Advanced
    Number of Witnesses: 2p/2d
    ISBNs:
    Paperback: 9781601564931
    Ebook: 9781601565266

    Ebook Reseller Sites
    Amazon, VitalSource, Google Play

    Detailed Table of Contents (PDF Download)

Related Products

United States ex rel. Rodriguez v. Hughes, et. Al.: Motions, Defendants Materials

United States ex rel. Rodriguez v. Hughes, et. Al.: Motions, Defendants Materials

Paul J. Zwier, Reuben A. Guttman, Matthew J. McCoyd, Alexander G. Barney

United States ex rel. Rodriguez v. Hughes, et. al.: Motions, Relators Materials

United States ex rel. Rodriguez v. Hughes, et. al.: Motions, Relators Materials

Paul J. Zwier, Reuben A. Guttman, Matthew J. McCoyd, Alexander G. Barney

United States ex rel. Rodriguez v. Hughes, et. al.: Trial

United States ex rel. Rodriguez v. Hughes, et. al.: Trial

Paul J. Zwier, Reuben A. Guttman, Matthew J. McCoyd, Alexander G. Barney

Close